MSI H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7788
MotherboardMSI H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130110
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 18:12
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 188
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 372
44% 341 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7790
Sapphire(174B E253) 1GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.13% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 32.1
0% 16.7 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 25
21% 25.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 7.13%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
90GB free
Firmware: P180831a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 194 197 195 194 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.3% Above average
Read 208
Write 184
Mixed 197
SusWrite 196
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 26.9
97% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 60.9
DQ Mixed 32.1
28% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate STM3250318AS 250GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 69 75 83 87 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 92.3
Write 91.2
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 70.3
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$40
47GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 55 55 53 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 53.3
Write 53
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 53.7
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 59%
Clover CD753LJ 750GB
404GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 74 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 73.5
Write 76.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 74.5
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 58%
A-DATA USB Flash Drive 4GB
4GB free, PID c96a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.9 4.3 3.6 4.4 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Read 3.7
Write 2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.8
4% 3 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AXIOM MEMORY Kingston 9905471-023.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788) Builds (Compare 1,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback