Asus M2N-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N-E  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 13:10
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 92.8
43% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 93.4
8-Core 94.6
12% 94 Pts
64-Core 94.2
6% 94.2 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 3650
Sapphire(174B BE42) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.4
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 4.9
3% 3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 1,832
Mixed 1,765
286% 1,236 MB/s
4K Read 221
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 138
604% 178 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 230
173% 232 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Toshiba MK5056GSY 500GB-$106
427GB free
Firmware: LH00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 85 85 81 86 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 57%
MAXTOR S TM3250310AS 250GB
219GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 31 33 32 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 21.7
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 31.1
39% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-E Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback