Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 21:59
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 213
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 298
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 42.5
Parallax 39.1
31% 40 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 27.8
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 466
Write 472
Mixed 370
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 51.1
173% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 352
268% 361 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
522GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 111 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 168
Write 137
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 109
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 108%
Samsung Type-C 64GB
32GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 24 23 25 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 42.3
Write 22.4
Mixed 28
SusWrite 23.5
37% 29 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 2.3
450% 6.17 MB/s
DQ Read 8.1
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 2.5
510% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-074.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 9905471-074.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback