Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 166
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 252
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Asus(1043 83A8) 1,024MB
Ram: 1,023MB, Driver: 306.23
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 6% Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 199 72 64 48 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 374
Write 333
Mixed 298
SusWrite 108
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 24.6
104% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 167
151% 226 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
193GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 160 156 172 172 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 160
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 167
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
713GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 142 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 165
Write 167
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 140
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905743-045.A00G 04CB 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.3% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback