Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '17 at 05:28
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 150
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 496
47% 388 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 83.2
55% 72.8 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 54.8
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ200PCSZ 200GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JZET6102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 488
Write 311
Mixed 390
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 17.1
91% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 59.6
DQ Mixed 18.1
21% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST32000646NS 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: G008 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 120
Write 124
Mixed 120
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.4% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback