Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 86.8 1-Core 133 2-Core 260 88% 160 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 710 76% 604 Pts	64-Core 706 44% 706 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3417) CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Lighting 68.7 Reflection 65.5 Parallax 93.9 56% 76 fps	MRender 67.6 Gravity 75.1 Splatting 48.3 51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 888GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 199 Write 143 Mixed 75.5 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 13,194 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 528GB free Firmware: 0911 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 6,085 Write 19.2 Mixed 43.5 1,466% 2,049 MB/s	4K Read 767 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 3.7 32,387% 257 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSCK.8FD Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.4% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 21 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 22.8 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	532x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	344x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	309x

RAM
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	115x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	94x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	41x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157