HP 700-249

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP 700-249 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory	4.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140115
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	May 20 '21 at 02:42
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	44%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 75.7 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 163 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 398 47% 364 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.9% Above average	Lighting 61.6 Reflection 68.8 Parallax 61.1 50% 63.8 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 65.2 Splatting 65.2 52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 162 182 187 189 183 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 376 Write 367 Mixed 312 SusWrite 179 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 27.7 93% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 244 206% 299 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: HP34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 23 23 25 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 393 Write 3.7 SusWrite 21.1 100% 139 MB/s	4K Read 286 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.7 12,246% 96.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	38.2% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 10.3 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700-249 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HP 700-249

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	23x
Core i7-4770IntelBench 76%, 498 samples	1x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 635NvidiaBench 6%, 3,722 samples	11x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
S400 120GBKingdianBench 66%, 1,721 samples	4x
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $113Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	2x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	2x

RAM
HP698650-154-KEB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GBKingstonBench 40%, 64 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	2x
Value DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 5,391 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16