QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory23.9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.9GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory21.3 GB free of 23.9258 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 01:53
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 16-Core
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 61.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 259
80% 151 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 1,004
90% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,009
62% 1,009 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W8000
AMD(1002 0B2A) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.45.01.26
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 47.9
28% 31.9 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 23.9
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 161GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 461 455 484 445 443 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 23GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8116 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 54.6
MC Write 56.6
MC Mixed 51.4
155% 54.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 136%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback