Lenovo F0BC0006AU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo F0BC0006AU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Gardenia CRB
Memory6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '21 at 13:28
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 34.5
2-Core 68.3
35% 53.9 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 128
16% 125 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Legend(17AA 3633) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 3.5
2% 3.47 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KM8-480G 480GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 9.3 164 25 131 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
Read 432
Write 343
Mixed 339
SusWrite 107
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 20.4
78% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 41.7
58% 104 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.8% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.3
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback