HP 655 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 8% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.06%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP 655 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1885
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120907
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	May 19 '21 at 01:10
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	66%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1200 APU 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.06% Terrible	Memory 13.8 1-Core 10.7 2-Core 14.6 9% 13 Pts	4-Core 15.9 8-Core 6.7 2% 11.3 Pts	64-Core 0.6 0% 0.6 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.06% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 7,882 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1885) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.62% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.4 1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.62% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 236GB free (System drive) Firmware: ES2OA60W SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 16 24 22 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 52.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 17.8 23% 32 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 45% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 46%
HUAWEI MMC Storage 8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.3 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	2.23% Terrible	Read 4.2 Write 4.7 Mixed 4 SusWrite 4.3 6% 4.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 11% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.23% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF25664HZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 4GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	3.02% Terrible	MC Read 0.4 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 0.7 3% 0.93 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.4 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.23 GB/s	Latency 370 11% 370 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 3.02% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 655 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP 655 Notebook PC

CPU
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples	24x
E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 25%, 3,595 samples	16x

GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	24x
Radeon HD 7340AMDBench 1%, 3,203 samples	16x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $40Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	5x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19H 1x4GBAdataBench 24%, 2,118 samples	3x
HP536727-H41-ELD 1x4GBKingstonBench 25%, 1,025 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $40

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359