Fujitsu ESPRIMO P920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P920  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3222-A1
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171129
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 20:13
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 105
53% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 207
23% 180 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
PNY(196E 1365) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.5% Below average
Lighting 48.2
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 40.4
39% 50.6 fps
MRender 54.4
Gravity 44.6
Splatting 39.8
37% 46.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 202 198 202 195 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 310
Write 299
Mixed 256
SusWrite 206
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 28.5
92% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 40.9
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 57.3
50% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 124%
TOSHIBA 500GB
265GB free
Firmware: 8102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 38 40 39 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 35.9
Write 36.1
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 38.2
26% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 60%
SAMSUNG m3 portable 3.0 500GB
135GB free, PID 6031
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 32.2
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 37.6
47% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 6.1
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 5.1
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P920 Builds (Compare 404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback