Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 14:20
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 182
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 312
42% 310 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 354.13
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.27 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37120G 240GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 89 56 65 66 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 426
Write 318
Mixed 324
SusWrite 115
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 26.7
113% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 168
153% 228 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905743-045.A00G 04CB 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
73.2% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 20.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 21.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback