Acer Predator G3-605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3-605
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130607
Uptime84.5 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 13:29
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 223
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 581
63% 501 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Sapphire(174B 0640) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 8.4
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 9
Splatting 7.4
6% 7.97 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTCAN102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 317 180 253 262 209 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 396
Write 344
Mixed 354
SusWrite 260
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 23.2
72% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 114
146% 261 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
725GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 183 187 186 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 163
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 185
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KBG/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-605 Builds (Compare 1,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback