Acer Aspire E5-571

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-571  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HB
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 04:36
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 57
2-Core 117
54% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 183
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Acer(1025 0940) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 6.7
4% 4.97 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 8.2
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,547
Write 35.1
Mixed 25.8
180% 869 MB/s
4K Read 360
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
546% 120 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMT451S6BFR8A-PBHJ 0114 SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 8GB
1600, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 16.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-571 Builds (Compare 769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback