Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-UD3  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 23:14
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 118
54% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 211
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.2% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 44.8
Parallax 40.2
35% 42.5 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 35.2
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 53 57 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 165
Write 61.2
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 55.7
21% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 25
94% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 79.6
DQ Write 61.5
DQ Mixed 65.6
50% 68.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 51%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
417GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 139 138 138 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 124
Write 129
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 137
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 75%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ KHX1600C9D3/4 12GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 14.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-UD3 Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback