Asrock 980DE3/U3S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 980DE3/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150904
Uptime147.9 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 15:32
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 116
57% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 241
29% 221 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 31.8
20% 27.1 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 25
Splatting 23.5
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 138 128 136 110 151 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.2% Poor
Read 103
Write 89.4
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 132
22% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 3.1
26% 7.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 8.8
DQ Mixed 44.9
25% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C80 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.1% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.9
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback