Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T902 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB25E
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180327
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 17 '21 at 15:22
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340M 12,487 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 69 1-Core 92 2-Core 170 63% 110 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 224 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fujitsu(10CF 16D0) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.6% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 2 Parallax 3.1 4% 3.17 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 5.4 4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.6% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB 6,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0200Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 51 49 56 55 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 351 Write 61.7 Mixed 94.1 SusWrite 58.4 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 17.8 68% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 67.4 DQ Mixed 56.1 83% 164 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 16.4 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	44x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x

SSD
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $113Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	5x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	5x
C400 RealSSD 128GBMicronBench 56%, 11,312 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 4,546 samples	6x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	3x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $113