Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory119.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 02:16
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 660
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 847
52% 847 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 38.4
31% 39.2 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 27.9
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$130
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 504
Write 450
Mixed 402
101% 452 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 47.1
150% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 285
233% 332 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$130
744GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 452
Mixed 402
101% 452 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 46.4
152% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 247
196% 270 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$130
502GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 503
Write 464
Mixed 405
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 45
143% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 289
233% 330 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 125%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
1.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 156
Write 161
Mixed 82
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.8
218% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 113%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
608GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 153
Write 120
Mixed 85.5
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
220% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 112%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
798GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 76.2
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 100%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 221
Write 222
Mixed 104
134% 182 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 1.5
422% 4.47 MB/s
DQ Read 2.9
DQ Write 5.7
DQ Mixed 3.9
37% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 138%
Imation 2GB
2GB free, PID 0137
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1.2
Write 0.5
Mixed 2
2% 1.23 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 43.2
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 22.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 111%
Great: 183%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $856
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback