Gateway DX4300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGateway DX4300  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway RS780
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '21 at 22:19
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 820
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 40.8
2-Core 80.3
40% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 121
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 31.4
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 39.4
26% 34.5 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 33.4
31% 38.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 25 21 19 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.93% Terrible
Read 1.2
Write 27.4
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 22.9
13% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 6.93%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
51GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 89 92 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 86.5
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 89.5
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 69%
PNY USB 3.0 to SATA-¢ó 250GB
224GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 28 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 27.8
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 27.4
18% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3120023A 120GB-$42
15GB free
Firmware: 3.30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 24 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 35.7
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 24.3
23% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DX4300 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway DX4300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback