PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Novatech Desktop PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110907 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 16 '21 at 16:07 |
Run Duration | 224 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
65%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon HD 6770
XFX(1682 3153) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
|
10.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$45
465GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 235 236 238 239 239 MB/s
|
64.5%
Good
|
|||
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
143GB free
Firmware: MU01.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 56 51 51 51 52 MB/s
|
41.2%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 83 67 80 84 84 MB/s
|
49.3%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
319GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 84 84 81 MB/s
|
52.7%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
|
11.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 16 16 16 16 MB/s
|
13.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
64GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 35 35 36 35 MB/s
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 2TB
543GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 70 70 70 MB/s
|
30.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 26x |
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 13x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 8x |
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $337 |