Asrock 880G Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 880G Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1900 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110926
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '21 at 11:54
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 79.5 1-Core 46.9 2-Core 104 49% 76.6 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 281 29% 234 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$44 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 242 242 243 245 241 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.3% Good	Read 274 Write 248 Mixed 278 SusWrite 242 59% 261 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 34.8 115% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 33 DQ Write 84.8 DQ Mixed 47.3 39% 55 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 125%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 50GB free Firmware: 2.06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 52 52 52 53 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 126 Write 57.4 Mixed 84.2 SusWrite 53 18% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 21.2 80% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 71.9 DQ Write 55.8 DQ Mixed 65.5 48% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 51%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 218GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 91 89 91 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 91.6 Write 96 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 90.7 60% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 55GB free Firmware: CC1H SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 62 63 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	51% Above average	Read 115 Write 109 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 62.8 63% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ER3006A 2x2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.8% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12.4 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 8.8 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 880G Pro3 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 880G Pro3

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	13x
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	2x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	2x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	10x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	3x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	2x

SSD
SHFS37A480G 480GBKingstonBench 55%, 1,387 samples	11x
SHFS37A480G 480GBKingstonBench 53%, 15 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
9905403-400.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-439.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBKingstonBench 53%, 8 samples	3x
9905403-400.A00LF 9905403-439.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 62 samples	2x
9905403-439.A00LF 9905403-400.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 48%, 56 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16