MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 19:47
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 159
2-Core 316
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 617
8-Core 1137
105% 877 Pts
64-Core 1,496
93% 1,496 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.1% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 123
Parallax 180
88% 137 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 111
Splatting 78.1
77% 96.5 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303121
SusWrite @10s intervals: 952 303 303 304 303 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,828
Write 999
Mixed 1,078
SusWrite 411
239% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 59.8
242% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 715
DQ Write 998
DQ Mixed 471
464% 728 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 210%
Great: 214%
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
638GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 818 727 277 295 294 295 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 100%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
677GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2062 1742 1744 1745 1748 1751 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,020
Write 2,246
Mixed 1,864
SusWrite 1,799
447% 1,982 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 79.3
280% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,418
DQ Write 1,252
DQ Mixed 1,353
1,010% 1,341 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 336%
Great: 347%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 320 322 318 318 328 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
ST500LM0 12 HN-M500MBB 500GB
430GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 34.4
Write 36.2
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 40.5
50% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 35.9
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 38.4
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550-A PRO (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 9,638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $753
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback