Acer Nitro AN515-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190805
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 14:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 236
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 588
62% 496 Pts
64-Core 558
35% 558 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1265) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2003 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 35
Parallax 6.7
2% 14.8 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 23.8
18% 21 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel RRT Master 512GB
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 164 195 210 225 203 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 415
Write 287
Mixed 374
SusWrite 205
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 30.5
112% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 161
145% 219 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 81%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 457 457 454 470 464 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 422
Mixed 406
SusWrite 459
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 51.1
165% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 114%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 24.1
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 24.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-52 Builds (Compare 5,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback