Dell OptiPlex 3070

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3070
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3070  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 11:05
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$122
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 83.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 258
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 488
61% 463 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Dell(1028 0930) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 3
Parallax 7.6
5% 5.7 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cl1-3d128-q11 NVMe LITEON 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22301114 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 120 102 98 99 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 1,190
Write 562
Mixed 265
SusWrite 136
117% 538 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 12
58% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 166
142% 216 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 136%
SAMSUNG HM321HX 320GB
78GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 35 38 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 17.4
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 37
41% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4ATF51264AZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3070 Builds (Compare 2,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3070

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback