Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 WS (all builds)
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131205
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '17 at 20:18
Run Duration	448 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$88 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 87.8 1-Core 114 2-Core 227 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 682 66% 545 Pts	64-Core 834 52% 834 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Asus(1043 8539) CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.3% Very good	Lighting 95.5 Reflection 102 Parallax 90 78% 95.8 fps	MRender 80.5 Gravity 86.3 Splatting 72.2 64% 79.6 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 99GB free Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 28291 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1205 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 59 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 434 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1668177413	71.6% Very good	Read 509 Write 239 Mixed 176 67% 308 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 13.2 98% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 31.9 67% 137 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 85%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 28266 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1152 (B1) Unknown 92 92 267 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 58 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 431 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22746940552	91.1% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 389 Mixed 422 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 80.8 4K Mixed 24.9 124% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 80.4 101% 178 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 534GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 168 2300 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1911 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25041 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 740 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 736 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1201 (C2) HDA temperature 107 98 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	89.9% Excellent	Read 166 Write 147 Mixed 135 112% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.54 4K Mixed 0.32 121% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 148GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 198 376 (03) Spinup time 176 169 4191 (04) Start/Stop count 76 76 24217 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 48 48 38163 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2159 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 578 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 193 193 23638 (C2) HDA temperature 107 101 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 13 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 193 945 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 36	64% Good	Read 109 Write 114 Mixed 108 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.46 124% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 76%
WD WD1500ADFD-00NLR1 150GB 1,859 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 127GB free Firmware: 21.07QR5 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 1 0 (03) Spinup time 166 160 4708 (04) Start/Stop count 74 74 26376 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 65535 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 38 38 45799 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 68 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 68 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4550 (C2) HDA temperature 105 89 42 (C4) Reallocation count 1 200 65535 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 65535 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	40% Average	Read 64.6 Write 74.4 Mixed 64.9 51% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.52 130% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 47%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 141GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 174 4008 (04) Start/Stop count 80 80 20040 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 47 47 39155 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2205 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 949 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 19090 (C2) HDA temperature 109 102 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 33 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	47.1% Average	Read 91 Write 72.7 Mixed 63.2 56% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.35 100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 76%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 391GB free, PID 1052 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 64.9 Write 63.2 Mixed 57.1 79% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.2 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 34%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,310 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 367GB free, PID 0202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 84.8 Write 85.5 Mixed 82.7 109% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.21 64% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 45%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 1GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 0715 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	4.74% Terrible	Read 17.4 Write 5.69 Mixed 8.07 11% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.84 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 16% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.74% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.7% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 30 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.9 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 54%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	106x
Core i7-4930KIntel $88Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	81x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	60x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	27x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	14x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	11x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 58%, 8,730 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	11x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GBKingstonBench 57%, 3,744 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $782

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16