MSI MS-16V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star Creator 15 A10SET
MotherboardMSI MS-16V2  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 04:53
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 198
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 574
53% 441 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12C6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 30
Parallax 5.6
4% 13.5 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 6.8
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ5 512GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 421 425 425 431 423 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 591
Mixed 556
SusWrite 428
118% 522 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 35.4
118% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 440
DQ Mixed 548
373% 453 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 101%
Great: 149%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 836 1320 1506 1343 1202 1129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1055
Write 978
Mixed 940
SusWrite 1,222
237% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 69.2
223% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 654
478% 637 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 215%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G26C16S4B.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 24.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 23
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16V2 Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback