Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 03:00
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 300
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 775
88% 687 Pts
64-Core 873
54% 873 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Geil ZENITH R3 240GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 294 294 236 296 297 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 296
Mixed 259
SusWrite 284
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 40.9
152% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 189
166% 246 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 111%
Hitachi HUP722020APA330 2TB
600GB free
Firmware: JKAOA36C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 99 99 102 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 91.6
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 99.8
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 71%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
517GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 96 97 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 96.3
Write 97.3
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 96
108% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK4GX4M1A2400C16 Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 23.3
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.5
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $653
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback