Pegatron IPMSB-H61

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPegatron IPMSB-H61  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPMSB-H61
Memory3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 01:18
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2020-$92
SOCKET 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 161
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 161
22% 160 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
EVGA(3842 1302) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 296.10
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.4
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 750GB (2012)
680GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 103 66 96 106 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
48% Average
Read 73
Write 88.3
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 93.8
61% 82 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
80GB free
Firmware: JPFOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 74.9
Write 72.6
Mixed 40
SusWrite 41.1
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 830B NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMSB-H61 Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron IPMSB-H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback