Gigabyte GA-H81M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S1  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '21 at 11:18
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 251
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 637
68% 542 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68% Good
Lighting 88.8
Reflection 74.1
Parallax 113
72% 91.9 fps
MRender 76.9
Gravity 90.8
Splatting 56.5
59% 74.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 346 251 367 262 373 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 410
Mixed 401
SusWrite 331
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 53
172% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 290
238% 339 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
594GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 160 161 161 160 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 116
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 160
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/8G Kingston 9905471-069.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 20
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S1 Builds (Compare 1,777 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback