Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora Ryzen Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0NWN7M
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200715
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '21 at 09:33
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 154
2-Core 302
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,180
104% 883 Pts
64-Core 2,070
128% 2,070 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Dell(1028 3759) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.37
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 112
Reflection 94.6
Parallax 109
91% 105 fps
Gravity 106
Splatting 86.3
84% 96.4 fps
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 2200S NVMe 1024GB
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22001060 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 998 1089 1164 1258 1147 501 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,287
Write 1,262
Mixed 1,097
SusWrite 1026
263% 1,168 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 56.2
183% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 833
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 906
663% 861 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 208%
Great: 219%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA HDWD240 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: KQ00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 154 149 170 170 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 179
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 157
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.5
263% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 102%
WD My Book 25EE 12TB
3.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 129 129 130 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 125
Write 129
Mixed 107
SusWrite 128
167% 122 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 1
338% 5.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 6
DQ Mixed 1.4
253% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 73%
Great: 103%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
6GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 9.4 31 39 48 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 286
Write 30.4
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 35.2
80% 92 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 7
647% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 8.6
939% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XRMWRN-MIE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 36.6
108% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 34.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Ryzen Edition Builds (Compare 880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $555
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback