Biostar Hi-Fi H77S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi H77S  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 14 '17 at 14:50
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 395
52% 392 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Gigabyte(1458 2556) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 22.9
14% 19 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 19.2
14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
314GB free
Firmware: CV23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 88.7
Write 174
Mixed 84.6
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.15
56% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 119%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CV22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 113
Write 164
Mixed 65.2
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 0.78
4K Mixed 0.07
32% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-025.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi H77S Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi H77S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $444
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback