Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85FC
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210119
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	May 13 '21 at 12:41
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 118 2-Core 249 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 657 61% 510 Pts	64-Core 579 36% 579 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 81%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv512g KIOXIA 512GB 1,898 User benchmarks, average bench 130% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 242 202 161 161 192 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Read 639 Write 210 Mixed 367 SusWrite 176 77% 348 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 26.9 126% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 935 DQ Write 83.2 DQ Mixed 146 198% 388 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 172%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GB 29,128 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	MC Read 32.5 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 23.2 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 23.7 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,615x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,512x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	499x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 113%, 8,196 samples	425x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	415x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	278x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	719x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	432x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	401x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16