Notebook P870KM_KM1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook P870KM_KM1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P870KM_KM1
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '17 at 04:03
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 247
92% 161 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 764
81% 646 Pts
64-Core 754
47% 754 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 0876) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.3% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 6.97
8% 9.07 fps
MRender 7.29
Gravity 4.63
Splatting 7.48
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 500GB-$100
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 498
Write 330
Mixed 266
80% 364 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 19.4
92% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 44.8
93% 194 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 119
Write 126
Mixed 80.3
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.37
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.14
102% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-013.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 22.4
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 25
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P870KM_KM1 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: Notebook P870KM_KM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback