Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 3.00GHz-$98 4,281 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Memory 40 1-Core 23.4 2-Core 42.3 23% 35.2 Pts	4-Core 16.9 8-Core 30.4 3% 23.6 Pts	64-Core 41.1 2% 41.1 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RADEON HD5450 784 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B A007) 1GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 2.1 2% 2.4 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 2 Splatting 2 2% 2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: VT100-41 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 354 Write 9 130% 181 MB/s	4K Read 66.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0 2,771% 22.3 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 38%
WL1000GSA6472B 1TB 582 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 40GB free Firmware: 01.01V01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 63 Write 10.5 Mixed 20.5 23% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 87.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 2.9 4,001% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.2% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.6 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.8 GB/s	Latency 202 20% 202 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 20%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 6700Intel $230Bench 39%, 2,388 samples	1x
Pentium D 3.00GHzIntel $98Bench 30%, 4,281 samples	1x
Xeon E5310IntelBench 34%, 31 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	1x
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	1x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	1x

SSD
0 250GBCt250mx5Bench 89%, 930 samples	1x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	1x
SSD 120GBGigabyte $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	1x

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $230

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16