Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '21 at 16:07
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 73
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 958
87% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,340
83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78% Very good
Lighting 97.7
Reflection 103
Parallax 93.9
80% 98.3 fps
MRender 88.8
Gravity 94
Splatting 91.3
75% 91.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid GIGABYTE GP-GSM2 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8TM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 19 68 75 115 110 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 296
Write 307
Mixed 235
SusWrite 77.6
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 7.8
60% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 49.7
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 50.7
39% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 68%
Amd-raid SanDisk SP2 240GB
105GB free
Firmware: R131
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 388 420 416 432 433 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.2% Very good
Read 478
Write 442
Mixed 268
SusWrite 401
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 19.5
77% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 82.1
98% 164 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid GIGABYTE GP-GSM2 128GB
67GB free
Firmware: E8TM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 26 177 485 114 22 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 262
Write 150
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 148
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 7.7
42% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 46.7
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 65.6
62% 92.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 68%
Amd-raid SanDisk SD6SF1M0 64GB
33GB free
Firmware: X231
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 151 150 147 152 153 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.6% Above average
Read 461
Write 151
Mixed 166
SusWrite 147
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 18.7
72% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 85.2
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 63.8
63% 97.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%
Amd-raid ST1500DL003-9VT1 1.5TB
838GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 116 113 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
67% Good
Read 119
Write 104
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 115
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
146% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67%
Great: 68%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
821GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 97 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 101
Write 75.7
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 98
119% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback