Apple iMacPro1,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMacPro1,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-7BA5B2D9E42DDD94
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200712
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 12 '21 at 12:42
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2140B
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 251
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 853
80% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,294
80% 1,294 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Apple(106B 017B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 786 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.3% Very good
Lighting 97.8
Reflection 84.8
Parallax 143
80% 108 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 98.8
Splatting 58.3
61% 76.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 717.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1733 1708 1575 1668 1794 1852 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 39.6
125% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMacPro1,1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Apple iMacPro1,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 142% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback