Asus VivoBook S14 X411UF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook S14 X411UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X411UF
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '21 at 12:40
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 207
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 195
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 1101) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6627
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
8.88% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 11.1
9% 12.3 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 8.9
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.88%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
721GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 96 104 104 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 85
Write 113
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 104
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.4
150% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 0A94 D4R4GS24A8R 8GB
2133, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 20.2
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook S14 X411UF Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook S14 X411UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback