Acer Aspire V5-471

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-471  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire V5-471
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '21 at 23:33
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 102
46% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 150
17% 132 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0727) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3304
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.7 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Imation 2.5" SATA3 240GB SSD A320
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 110 92 91 91 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 429
Write 241
Mixed 298
SusWrite 137
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 27.2
98% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 185
159% 234 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HB3SU004GFM8MML16 079E TMT451S6BFR8A-PBHJ 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-471 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-471

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback