Foxconn 671MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFoxconn 671MX  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 671MX
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '21 at 17:50
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 430
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Memory 38.4
1-Core 19.4
2-Core 18.8
19% 25.5 Pts
4-Core 19.9
8-Core 19.4
3% 19.6 Pts
64-Core 19.6
1% 19.6 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4730
PwrHis(1787 3000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 7.6
8% 8.83 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 8.3
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD082GJ 80GB-$23
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 64 53 63 63 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 53.2
Write 70.2
Mixed 44.6
SusWrite 58.6
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
8.65% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.65%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback