Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 11 '21 at 05:16
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 169
2-Core 334
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,237
112% 941 Pts
64-Core 2321
144% 2321 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
Gigabyte(1458 2328) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
168% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 243
Parallax 422
170% 292 fps
MRender 366
Gravity 156
Splatting 265
213% 262 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 168%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
753GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 115 115 116 119 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 808
Write 913
Mixed 759
SusWrite 117
146% 649 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 40.5
177% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 393
DQ Mixed 226
192% 274 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 106%
Great: 411%
Amd-raid Array 4 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1281 649 655 550 440 446 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 3,094
Write 1,620
Mixed 1,761
SusWrite 670
395% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 42.6
164% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 241
226% 337 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 232%
Great: 277%
Amd-raid Array 5 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2400 836 839 837 840 838 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,555
Write 2,734
Mixed 1,824
SusWrite 1,098
460% 2,053 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 79.6
258% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 513
DQ Write 1,243
DQ Mixed 815
640% 857 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 289%
Great: 214%
Amd-raid Array 2 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 86 89 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 166
Write 152
Mixed 95
SusWrite 91.7
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
640% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 75%
Great: 123%
Amd-raid Array 3 12TB
5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 105 103 93 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 150
Write 171
Mixed 139
SusWrite 99.5
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 4
1,439% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 66.2
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 41.7
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 38.8
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 131%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,714
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback