HP 655 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP 655 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1885
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120427
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 13 '17 at 14:44
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Memory 51
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 39.2
26% 36.9 Pts
4-Core 40.5
8-Core 41.1
5% 40.8 Pts
64-Core 42.5
3% 42.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7340
HP(103C 1885) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.92
Parallax 1.84
1% 1.72 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 1.87
1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 95.2
Mixed 96.2
74% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.19
70% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 655 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 655 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback