HP TouchSmart 7320 Lavaca-B EU L6 PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP TouchSmart 7320 Lavaca-B EU L6 PC  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AC3
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 14:16
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2130-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 78
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 166
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 224
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2AC3) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900KB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 224 239 241 242 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.7% Good
Read 245
Write 204
Mixed 217
SusWrite 236
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 27.9
97% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 122
104% 149 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CK0 M471B5773DH0-CK0 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TouchSmart 7320 Lavaca-B EU L6 PC Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP TouchSmart 7320 Lavaca-B EU L6 PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback