MSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A21
MotherboardMSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)  (all builds)
Memory120.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 22:42
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 222
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 854
80% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,201
74% 1,201 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3364) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 148
Parallax 137
110% 140 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 147
Splatting 124
106% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
740GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1431 1452 1402 1353 1348 1379 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,455
Write 1490
Mixed 1,062
SusWrite 1,394
304% 1,350 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 64.7
226% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 732
DQ Mixed 272
318% 545 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 243%
Great: 255%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
281GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 131 130 131 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 323
Write 383
Mixed 299
SusWrite 130
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 32.4
114% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 39
38% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 99%
Mushkin MKNSSDRW1TB 1TB
301GB free
Firmware: S0618A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 389 388 388 388 394 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 392
Write 364
Mixed 343
SusWrite 390
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 24.1
120% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 27.3
34% 56.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 104%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$70
360GB free
Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1369 1499 1507 1508 1510 1507 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,367
Write 1,286
Mixed 913
SusWrite 1,483
284% 1,262 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 56.8
198% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 731
DQ Mixed 675
554% 796 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 245%
Great: 242%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
519GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 131 129 132 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 131
Write 101
Mixed 69
SusWrite 130
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 3001 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 59.1
MC Write 61.5
MC Mixed 52.1
164% 57.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 23.3
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 144%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21) Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback