Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 129% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 155% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	56 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200701
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 09 '21 at 20:22
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 67.5 1-Core 142 2-Core 282 87% 164 Pts	4-Core 520 8-Core 1,056 93% 788 Pts	64-Core 2,140 132% 2,140 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2382) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	158% Outstanding	Lighting 214 Reflection 202 Parallax 248 174% 221 fps	MRender 256 Gravity 213 Splatting 166 168% 212 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 63 15 7.3 77 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 1366 Write 911 Mixed 798 SusWrite 109 176% 796 MB/s	4K Read 54.7 4K Write 59.3 4K Mixed 17.5 137% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 13.5 DQ Mixed 24.7 55% 123 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 209%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 1.5TB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 398 418 419 409 425 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 430 Mixed 417 SusWrite 415 99% 441 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 37.8 131% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 74.6 DQ Mixed 148 109% 147 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 74GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,602 Write 2,259 Mixed 1,642 481% 2,167 MB/s	4K Read 68 4K Write 183 4K Mixed 94.1 320% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 1,009 DQ Write 1,130 DQ Mixed 1160 848% 1,099 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 683GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 159 162 166 166 170 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Read 135 Write 145 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 164 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 106%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3.5TB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 105 106 103 107 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 126 Write 109 Mixed 77.1 SusWrite 107 139% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 0.7 274% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 63%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB 1,723 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 30GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 17 18 14 17 18 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	8.84% Terrible	Read 26.1 Write 9 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 15.5 21% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.84% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB 18,655 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 27.5 82% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.8 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 26 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $144Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	872x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	834x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	515x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	403x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	340x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	272x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $937

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16