Guoshuo X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardGuoshuo X58  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 14:01
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5620
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 121
54% 87 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 294
31% 248 Pts
64-Core 300
18% 300 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670
Sapphire(174B 7670) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 5.8
6% 6.8 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 6
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK1T9TBY-1AR1ZABYY 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: D0MU021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 229 234 234 236 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56% Above average
Read 250
Write 241
Mixed 220
SusWrite 231
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 23.1
77% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 184
137% 180 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 56%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0-CH9 MXIC 25L8005 37GB
1333, 33 MHz
4096, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Guoshuo X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback