Hp-pavilion WC786AA-UUW p6360sc

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion WC786AA-UUW p6360sc  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI IONA
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100128
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 13:17
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 119
50% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 148
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 36
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 37.8
29% 37.8 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 27.1
27% 34 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 122 165 178 177 177 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.3% Good
Read 253
Write 239
Mixed 224
SusWrite 154
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 33.5
110% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 198
147% 193 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 124%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
35GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 180 77 58 65 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 245
Write 206
Mixed 210
SusWrite 102
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 24.5
95% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 142
119% 171 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
635GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 174 173 182 171 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 59.7
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 172
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AD80AD80 HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.3% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 11.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WC786AA-UUW p6360sc Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Hp-pavilion WC786AA-UUW p6360sc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback