Dell OptiPlex 790

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 790
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 790  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110910
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 11:55
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 140
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 182
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
37GB free
Firmware: ST1OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 83 90 89 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 93
Write 92.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 89.1
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 47 83 81 90 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 108
Write 98.3
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 69.2
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB
14GB free
Firmware: PC4OC72E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 56 57 58 58 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 38.5
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 54.8
28% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 M378B5773DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 14.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 790 Builds (Compare 5,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 790

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback