Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191018
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 02:41
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 79.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 276
89% 165 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 764
76% 617 Pts
64-Core 898
56% 898 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2176 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.8% Below average
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 143
Parallax 130
0% 90.9 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
102% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 200
Write 174
Mixed 199
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 16.8
79% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 67.6
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 162
114% 139 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
194GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2015 793 764 772 643 434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,574
Write 1,356
Mixed 1,745
SusWrite 903
314% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 77.3
249% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1331
DQ Write 963
DQ Mixed 1,147
857% 1,147 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 247%
Great: 298%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 500GB
39GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 84 83 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 394
Write 106
Mixed 292
SusWrite 85.3
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 30.4
99% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 88.5
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 128
96% 126 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 95%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 120GB
76GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 83 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 379
Write 83.6
Mixed 140
SusWrite 84.8
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 12.7
55% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 42.8
DQ Mixed 19.7
30% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 58%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
140GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 132 130 134 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 147
Write 135
Mixed 108
SusWrite 132
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.7
7% 3.43 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 1.2
2% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 23%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
17GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 104 102 103 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60% Good
Read 104
Write 114
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 105
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 36.5
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 30.7
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback