Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	51.6% Above average	Memory 67.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 168 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 312 31% 253 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 18.4 15% 18 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 18.7 Splatting 16.7 14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59 19,180 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 45 47 26 40 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 4 Write 6.2 Mixed 10.4 SusWrite 34.9 10% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.1 34% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8C 1x8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 10.1 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 5.4 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM