Asrock H81M-GL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-GL  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 15:31
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 194
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 408
55% 408 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 42
Parallax 39.1
31% 39.7 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 28.1
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 36 47 31 45 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 41.8
Write 43.8
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 44
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
31GB free
Firmware: SS16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 72 72 70 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 56
SusWrite 70.9
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 60%
Seagate BACKUP+ 500GB
38GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 37 36 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 21
Write 8.2
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 29.5
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
14% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 14
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-GL Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-GL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback